<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.naomiklein.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Articles by Naomi Klein</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/all</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Olympics: Unveiling Police State 2.0</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/08/olympics-unveiling-police-state-2-0</link>
 <description>August 7th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So far, the Olympics have been an open invitation to China-bash, a bottomless excuse for Western journalists to go after the Commies on everything from internet censorship to Darfur. Through all the nasty news stories, however, the Chinese government has seemed amazingly unperturbed. That&#039;s because it is betting on this: when the opening ceremonies begin friday, you will instantly forget all that unpleasantness as your brain is zapped by the cultural/athletic/political extravaganza that is the Beijing Olympics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 

Like it or not, you are about to be awed by China&#039;s sheer awesomeness.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/08/olympics-unveiling-police-state-2-0&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  7 Aug 2008 10:25:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">715 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Disaster Capitalism: State of Extortion</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/07/disaster-capitalism-state-extortion</link>
 <description>July 3rd, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Once oil passed $140 a barrel, even the most rabidly right-wing media hosts had to prove their populist cred by devoting a portion of every show to bashing Big Oil. Some have gone so far as to invite me on for a friendly chat about an insidious new phenomenon: &quot;disaster capitalism.&quot; It usually goes well--until it doesn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 

For instance, &quot;independent conservative&quot; radio host Jerry Doyle and I were having a perfectly amiable conversation about sleazy insurance companies and inept politicians when this happened: &quot;I think I have a quick way to bring the prices down,&quot; Doyle announced. &quot;We&#039;ve invested $650 billion to liberate a nation of 25 million people. Shouldn&#039;t we just demand that they give us oil? There should be tankers after tankers backed up like a traffic jam getting into the Lincoln Tunnel, the Stinkin&#039; Lincoln, at rush hour with thank-you notes from the Iraqi government.... Why don&#039;t we just take the oil? We&#039;ve invested it liberating a country. I can have the problem solved of gas prices coming down in ten days, not ten years.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

There were a couple of problems with Doyle&#039;s plan, of course. The first was that he was describing the biggest stickup in world history. The second, that he was too late: &quot;We&quot; are already heisting Iraq&#039;s oil, or at least are on the cusp of doing so. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080721/lookout&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Read the rest of the article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/07/disaster-capitalism-state-extortion&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  3 Jul 2008 16:18:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">639 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obama&#039;s Chicago Boys</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/06/obamas-chicago-boys</link>
 <description>June 13th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Barack Obama waited just three days after Hillary Clinton pulled out of the race to declare, on CNBC, &quot;Look. I am a pro-growth, free-market guy. I love the market.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Demonstrating that this is no mere spring fling, he has appointed 37-year-old Jason Furman to head his economic policy team. Furman is one of Wal-Mart&#039;s most prominent defenders, anointing the company a &quot;progressive success story.&quot; On the campaign trail, Obama blasted Clinton for sitting on the Wal-Mart board and pledged, &quot;I won&#039;t shop there.&quot; For Furman, however, it&#039;s Wal-Mart&#039;s critics who are the real threat: the &quot;efforts to get Wal-Mart to raise its wages and benefits&quot; are creating &quot;collateral damage&quot; that is &quot;way too enormous and damaging to working people and the economy more broadly for me to sit by idly and sing &#039;Kum-Ba-Ya&#039; in the interests of progressive harmony.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 

Obama&#039;s love of markets and his desire for &quot;change&quot; are not inherently incompatible. &quot;The market has gotten out of balance,&quot; he says, and it most certainly has. Many trace this profound imbalance back to the ideas of Milton Friedman, who launched a counterrevolution against the New Deal from his perch at the University of Chicago economics department. And here there are more problems, because Obama--who taught law at the University of Chicago for a decade--is thoroughly embedded in the mind-set known as the Chicago School. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080630/klein&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Read the rest of the article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

See the University of Chicago &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine/resources/faculty-letter-mfi&quot;&gt;faculty&#039;s letter&lt;/a&gt; about the Milton Friedman Institute.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;





&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/06/obamas-chicago-boys&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">620 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Regime-Quakes in Burma and China</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/05/regime-quakes</link>
 <description>May 16th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When news arrived of the catastrophic earthquake in Sichuan, my mind turned to Zheng Sun Man, an up-and-coming security executive I met on a recent trip to China. Zheng heads Aebell Electrical Technology, a Guangzhou-based company that makes surveillance cameras and public address systems and sells them to the government. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Zheng, a 28-year-old MBA with a text-messaging addiction, was determined to persuade me that his cameras and speakers are not being used against pro-democracy activists or factory organizers. They are for managing natural disasters, Zheng explained, pointing to the freak snowstorms before Lunar New Year. During the crisis, the government &quot;was able to use the feed from the railway cameras to communicate how to deal with the situation and organize an evacuation. We saw how the central government can command from the north emergencies in the south.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/05/regime-quakes&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:08:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">606 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>China&#039;s All-Seeing Eye</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/05/chinas-all-seeing-eye</link>
 <description>May 14th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Published in 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/20797485/chinas_allseeing_eye&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Rolling Stone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;em&gt;With the help of U.S. defense contractors, China is building the prototype for a high-tech police state. It is ready for export.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Thirty years ago, the city of Shenzhen didn&#039;t exist. Back in those days, it was a string of small fishing villages and collectively run rice paddies, a place of rutted dirt roads and traditional temples. That was before the Communist Party chose it — thanks to its location close to Hong Kong&#039;s port — to be China&#039;s first &quot;special economic zone,&quot; one of only four areas where capitalism would be permitted on a trial basis. The theory behind the experiment was that the &quot;real&quot; China would keep its socialist soul intact while profiting from the private-sector jobs and industrial development created in Shenzhen. The result was a city of pure commerce, undiluted by history or rooted culture — the crack cocaine of capitalism. It was a force so addictive to investors that the Shenzhen experiment quickly expanded, swallowing not just the surrounding Pearl River Delta, which now houses roughly 100,000 factories, but much of the rest of the country as well. Today, Shenzhen is a city of 12.4 million people, and there is a good chance that at least half of everything you own was made here: iPods, laptops, sneakers, flatscreen TVs, cellphones, jeans, maybe your desk chair, possibly your car and almost certainly your printer.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/05/chinas-all-seeing-eye&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:52:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">599 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Financial Times Diary: Smoke and Memories in Buenos Aires</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/05/diary-financial-times</link>
 <description>May 4th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are circling over Buenos Aires. The airspace is crowded with other planes, all of them holding like ours. The pilot explains that it is the fault of the humo, or smoke, a word I will hear a great deal in the coming week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

An hour and a half later I am on the ground, head pounding, breathing in the humo. The cover of the Clarín newspaper shows someone gagging and declares: &quot;The Worst Atmospheric Contamination in History.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Some things, such as slight overstatement, haven&#039;t changed in Buenos Aires. Still, it&#039;s hard not to think of the first time I came here. It was January 2002. The economy had just crashed, the banks had locked out their customers and Argentines had thrown out five presidents in three weeks. There was smoke in the air then, too, but it was from the bonfires in the streets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/05/diary-financial-times&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun,  4 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">592 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An Essay by Tom Englehardt: 12 Reasons to Get Out of Iraq</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/04/essay-tom-englehardt-12-reasons-get-out-iraq</link>
 <description>April 28th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Written by Tom Engelhardt, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174921&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;TomDispatch.com&lt;/a&gt;, April 20, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Can there be any question that, since the invasion of 2003, Iraq has been unraveling? And here&#039;s the curious thing: Despite a lack of decent information and analysis on crucial aspects of the Iraqi catastrophe, despite the way much of the Iraq story fell off newspaper front pages and out of the TV news in the last year, despite so many reports on the &quot;success&quot; of the President&#039;s surge strategy, Americans sense this perfectly well. In the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, 56% of Americans &quot;say the United States should withdraw its military forces to avoid further casualties&quot; and this has, as the Post notes, been a majority position since January 2007, the month that the surge was first announced. Imagine what might happen if the American public knew more about the actual state of affairs in Iraq -- and of thinking in Washington. So, here, in an attempt to unravel the situation in ever-unraveling Iraq are twelve answers to questions which should be asked far more often in this country: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/04/essay-tom-englehardt-12-reasons-get-out-iraq&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:05:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">590 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Players, Not Cheerleaders</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/03/players-not-cheerleaders</link>
 <description>March 26th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;So?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

So said Dick Cheney when asked last week about public opinion being
overwhelming against the war in Iraq. &quot;You can&#039;t be blown off course
by polls.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

His attitude about the the fact that the number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq has reached 4,000 displayed similar levels of sympathy. They &quot;voluntarily put on the uniform,&quot; the Vice-President told ABC news.

This brick wall of indifference helps explain the paradox in which we
in the anti-war camp find ourselves five years into the occupation of
Iraq: anti-war sentiment is as strong as ever, but our movement seems
to be dwindling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Sixty-four per cent of Americans tell pollsters they oppose the war,
but you&#039;d never know it from the thin turnout at recent anniversary
rallies and vigils.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

When asked why they aren&#039;t expressing their anti-war opinions through
the anti-war movement, many say they have simply lost faith in the
power of protest. They marched against the war before it began,
marched on the first, second and third anniversaries. And yet five
years on, U.S. leaders are still shrugging: &quot;So?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/03/players-not-cheerleaders&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">575 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obama, Being Called a Muslim Is Not a Smear</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/02/obama-being-called-muslim-not-smear</link>
 <description>February 28th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hillary Clinton denied leaking the photo of Barack Obama wearing a turban, but her campaign manager says that even if she had, it would be no big deal. &quot;Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Sure she did. And George W. Bush put on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/fashion/main.jhtml?xml=/fashion/2004/11/23/efponch23.xml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;fetching Chamato poncho&lt;/a&gt; in Santiago, while Paul Wolfowitz burned up YouTube with his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGKrOW3HaGg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;antimalarial African dance routines&lt;/a&gt; when he was World Bank prez. The obvious difference is this: when white politicians go ethnic, they just look funny. When a black presidential contender does it, he looks foreign. And when the ethnic apparel in question is vaguely reminiscent of the clothing worn by Iraqi and Afghan fighters (at least to many Fox viewers, who think any headdress other than a baseball cap is a declaration of war on America), the image is downright frightening.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/02/obama-being-called-muslim-not-smear&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:52:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">571 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Police and Tasers: Hooked on Shock</title>
 <link>http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/02/police-and-tasers</link>
 <description>February 11th, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The past couple of weeks have been rocky on the stock market, but one company that hasn’t been suffering too much is Taser International. At the end of January, its stock jumped by an impressive 8 per cent, and it’s even higher today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Matthew McKay, a stock analyst at Jeffries &amp; Co. in San Francisco, cites a simple cause: news that the Toronto Police Services Board plans to buy 3,000 new Taser electroshock weapons, at a cost of $8.6 million for gear and training. If the deal goes ahead, tasers would become standard issue weaponry for all of Toronto’s frontline officers, right next to their handcuffs and batons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

On Wednesday night, I participated in a public forum about the prospect of a fully taser-armed police force, organized by the Toronto Police Accountability Coalition. One speaker, who had a history of psychiatric illness, told the room: “We’re worried because we’re the people who are going to get shocked.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/02/police-and-tasers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:38:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Naomi Klein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">567 at http://www.naomiklein.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
